Pitch Summary:

Act 174 provides Town planners with the opportunity to designate certain sites as “preferred” for renewable energy development, based on environmental, aesthetics and other local criteria. But the 2017 5.100 net metering rules include a definition of a renewable energy “plant” to be one which is not sited within close proximity of another plant. This definition prevents multiple solar arrays from being located on a preferred site, which defeats both the concept of preferred siting and restricts progress on “90 by 2050”. The legislature and the Public Utility Commission should amend 5.100 to permit net metering solar arrays to be sited within close proximity, so long as they are on land designated by the Town as “preferred” for solar siting. This could also help vulnerable Vermont farmers to lease more of their land for solar, generating revenue to promote their financial sustainability and farm viability.

Submitted by: Sam Carlson – Green Lantern Group

[pdf-embedder url=”https://eanvt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/EAN-Pitch-8-Sam-Carlson-Green-Lantern-Group-Preference-vs-Proximity.output.pdf” title=”EAN Pitch 8 – Sam Carlson – Green Lantern Group – Preference vs Proximity.output”]

Recent Posts

 

Addressing affordability: Why fossil fuels are not the answer

Blog Addressing affordability: Why fossil fuels are not the answer by Jared Duval, EAN Executive Director January 22, 2025   One thing nearly all Vermonters seem to agree on is that we want living in our state to be more affordable. When it comes to energy,...

Key Insights from the latest Vermont Energy Dashboard update

Blog 5 Key insights from the latest Vermont Energy Dashboard update December 19, 2024 The two largest sources of climate pollution in Vermont come from how we get around and how we heat our homes and businesses. As of the latest data from Vermont’s greenhouse gas...